President Donald Trump announced last week that the headquarters for the U.S. Space Command will be moving to Huntsville’s Redstone Arsenal, prompting a flurry of celebration from Alabama’s leaders. 

Space Command is currently based out of Colorado Springs, and oversees enabling satellite-based navigation, troop communications and provides warnings about missile launches utilizing joint forces from other branches of the U.S. military. It is a distinct program from the U.S. Space Force, which is a separate branch of the military working to train military personnel to protect the U.S. from space-related threats.

Alabama had initially been selected by the U.S. Air Force in 2021 as the best site to headquarters Space Command. However, in 2023, then-president Joe Biden decided Colorado Springs should be the permanent headquarters for the operation, saying that housing Space Command in Colorado would avoid a disruption in readiness.

Space Command’s new headquarters will be located on the Redstone Arsenal, an Army base that houses several government agencies and contractors including the Department of Defense, the Department of Justice, the FBI and NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center. 

Approximately 60 acres of land has been identified in the arsenal for the headquarters. Redstone Arsenal officials have said that the headquarters could be up and running before Trump leaves office, predicting that construction for a temporary site can be done within 18 to 24 months.

“They’ve been doing a lot of the homework for what’s necessary to be done, so we can move along very quickly,” Huntsville Mayor Tommy Battle said.

The new headquarters are projected to bring up to 30,000 jobs to the area according to the Trump administration. But, there have been some questions over that number. Battle said that the city was expecting between 1,200 to 1,600 direct jobs from the relocation, while U.S. Rep. Dale Strong, R-Monrovia, has said Space Command will bring 1,700 direct jobs and 3,000 spinoff jobs. 

“We would never argue with the president,” Battle told AL.com last week. “Everybody’s got to remember, this is over a period of time. Over the period of five years, whatever it brings to us, there could be additional people coming. There could be a spinoff effect.”

Other Alabama politicians celebrated the announcement as well last week.

“I’m deeply grateful to President Trump and Secretary Hegseth for their commitment to keep politics out of this basing decision and allow the Air Force to proceed with doing its job,” Sen. Katie Britt, R-AL, said regarding the decision.

Gov. Kay Ivey weighed in on the decision as well saying, ““As I have said all along, there is no better place to locate Space Command Headquarters than in Huntsville, Alabama. Today, the facts prevailed, and it is official: Space Command Headquarters is coming to Sweet Home Alabama.”

However, Colorado state officials are less than satisfied about Space Command’s move, announcing their intentions to take legal action to prevent relocation. 

“The Colorado Attorney General’s Office has been preparing in the event the president made such an unlawful decision to move Space Command HQ,” Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser said in the statement. “If the Trump administration takes this step – I’m prepared to challenge it in court.”

What grounds Colorado plans to take legal action on are still unclear.

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall responded to Weiser’s statement by saying Alabama is prepared to fight for Space Command.

“We’re pretty confident in our ability to defend the announcement from President Trump that we heard earlier this week about moving Space Command to Alabama, and I don’t know what the specific challenge will be from Colorado,” Marshall said.

Alabama top stories in brief

State, AHSAA clash over athletics eligibility, school choice

• Alabama officials and the Alabama High School Athletics Association have butted heads this week over the organization’s rule forcing some athletes participating in the state’s CHOOSE Act to be ineligible to compete for a year. 
• Gov. Kay Ivey announced she was suing over this rule last week, prompting a Montgomery County judge to issue a restraining order against the rule.
• AHSAA rules require that transfer student athletes that receive financial aid from their schools must not compete for their new school for a year. AHSAA considers Alabama’s new school voucher program, the CHOOSE Act, to be financial aid and, therefore, has required student athletes who transferred schools using CHOOSE Act funds to sit out this year.
• However, the CHOOSE Act itself provides verbiage saying, “Nothing in this act shall affect or change the athletic eligibility of student athletes governed by the Alabama High School Athletic Association or similar association,” prompting state lawmakers to call the AHSAA’s transfer rule illegal.

Tuberville raise $1 million in August, ‘dark money’ accusations fly in AG race

• U.S. Sen. Tommy Tuberville raised more than $1 million in campaign contributions in August for his gubernatorial bid, according to the politician’s most recent campaign finance reports.
• Tuberville’s campaign reported 11 contributions of $20,000 or more last month, in addition to 40 contributions from businesses.
• Meanwhile, former Alabama Supreme Court Justice Jay Mitchell leads in campaign contributions for the state’s contentious attorney general race. Mitchell raised $371,095 last month, bringing his total campaign contributions to $2.04 million.
• Mitchell’s opponent Katherine Robertson raised $260,515 in August, bringing her total to $1.77 million. Other AG candidate Blount County District Attorney Pamela Casey raised $6,145 in August, bringing her total to $100,676. 
• Mitchell has criticized Robertson’s campaign contributions from First Principles Action, a Tennessee-based non-profit that has donated $1.1 million to Robertson’s campaign, as being “dark money” since the organization is not required to disclose its donors.

Alabama Supreme Court sends ALDOC forced labor lawsuit back to civil appeals court

• The Alabama Supreme Court on Friday sent a case from Alabama inmates arguing that the Alabama Department of Corrections is forcing them into forced labor back to the civil appeals court.
• The case, in which inmates are arguing that ADOC’s punishment for inmates who fail to go to work violates their rights under Alabama’s constitution against slavery and involuntary servitude, was sent to the state supreme court because the civil appeals court determined the inmate’s damages appeal exceeded $50,000. The civil appeals court only has jurisdiction in cases with amounts below $50,000, according to state law.
• However, Alabama Supreme Court justices wrote in their ruling that they are unsure how the civil appeals court came to that number. Additionally, inmates have said that they are not seeking financial compensation in this case, but, rather, a ruling on the constitutionality of ADOC’s prison labor practices.

Like our work? Then support it!

Want to get early access to columns, unique newsletters and help keep The Sunrise News active? Then support us on Ko-Fi!

Support our work!